“Patterson appealed to his audience to hear each other carefully and avoid fighting over the distinctions. Pressed by another listener as to whether those who hold to Calvinism, often called "the doctrines of grace," are to be accepted as part of the convention, Patterson reiterated that the Baptist Faith and Message is the SBC's agreed-upon, adopted statement of faith.Indeed, any constraint within the BF&M on the Arminian-to-Calvinist spectrum falls on the Arminian side. Article V states “All true believers endure to the end,” and references scriptures such as John 5:24 and 10:28. The Baptist Press article continued:
"There's plenty of room under the umbrella for anyone who is anything from a one- to five-point Calvinist," Patterson said, stipulating that any Southern Baptist would have to agree upon the perseverance of the saints to keep from being an Arminian.
"There's room for a two- or three-pointer like me, provided he can explain what is meant by two and three. There's room for four- and five-pointers whom I believe lack scriptural justification for that, but I'm certainly not in favor of running them out."
Patterson described Southern Baptists as a people who believe the Bible to be the Word of God as their final authority, that salvation is by grace through faith alone and that adult-like faith witnessed by believer's baptism provides a testimony to a watching world. "If we believe those things all fall within the purview of the Baptist faith, then there's plenty of room for all of us in these various emphases that we bring. I think they're all very helpful."
Each side in the Calvinist /Non-Calvinist debate needs to acknowledge there are some difficult passages to deal with. Peter referred to some of these passages, saying, “He [Paul] speaks about these things in all his letters, in which there are some matters that are hard to understand.” (2 Peter 3:16a HCSB) We will not allow anyone to twist and distort the plain truth of the Gospel—that only by the grace of God, the regeneration and washing of the Holy Spirit, through Christ’s substitutionary sacrifice may any of us gain entrance into the kingdom of heaven. At the same time, we also must not allow anyone to label as heretics those who deal differently with difficult passages.
I have been in the fray, calling whichever side that didn't agree with me a "heretic". Just so, I have received that same accusation from those who were on the opposing side of the debate. It was all new and I had jumped in with guns blazing! God has been gracious to me though. I now agree that both Calvinists and non-Calvinist should get along.
ReplyDeleteI would like to offer some food for thought if you don't mind.
1. I may define Arminianism differently than you, for I don't necessarily associate that with the denial of the perseverance of the saints. I understand it's a loaded term, and Calvinists have succesfully gotten almost all to associate the two. Here is a site of a friend who is an "ex-calvinists" He does not deny perseverance of the saints but squarely places him self as an Arminian.
Again, I believe going by the term non-Calvinists is fine, I'm just providing sharing some of the things I've been turning over in my head when it comes to accurately labeling sides of the debate.
oh, and to your question in your profile "(What do you call a non-Calvinist reformer?)" You can still call him a Reformer as it's my understanding Arminius and his followers were soundly in the reformer class. I believe it's another misconception to equate "Reformer" with "Calvinist".
http://evangelicalarminians.org/node/445
Well, enough links for one comment. I truly hope you do not mind. Thank you for your call to peace on this issue. I've been in the heat of the fight and much of it is not Christ exalting.